- Title: Hands on the Wheel
- Thesis Statement The thought of driverless cars is ridiculous because it relieves people of using their brain, takes the responsibility off of them, and hurts business for both taxi companies’ and Uber.
- Topic Sentences: To be determined
- Source Material: “Are we ready for driverless cars?.”
- Rebuttal: The overall argument of the debate is that driverless cars are the wave of the future as long as the government can regulate it. The opposing argument is that a driverless car don’t have the ability to go out of its pre-programmed algorithm and make the same moral decisions that human drivers would have to make if faced with something like an unavoidable accident.
I don't have some strong fantastic rebuttal yet, but I don't think it is the goverments job to micro-manage everything. I also don't think driverless cars are the answer to lives problems in the driving world because even though not every human is capable computers have their glitches too.